The blockchain research and development firm Babylon Labs submitted a 
Temperature Check to Aave DAO on Monday, seeking approval to integrate 
Trustless Bitcoin Vaults with Aave V4 and onboard native BTC as collateral 
without bridges, wrappers, or custodians. BTC Holders Could Borrow on Aave V4 
Without Bridges if Babylon Labs Vote Passes The proposal calls […]

The blockchain research and development firm Babylon Labs submitted a Temperature Check to Aave DAO on Monday, seeking approval to integrate Trustless Bitcoin Vaults with Aave V4 and onboard native BTC as collateral without bridges, wrappers, or custodians. BTC Holders Could Borrow on Aave V4 Without Bridges if Babylon Labs Vote Passes The proposal calls &#8230;

Aave DAO Faces Vote on Native BTC Collateral as Babylon Labs Files Temp Check

The event could redefine investment in robotics by merging blockchain 
liquidity with real-world robotics, potentially transforming capital markets.
The post Aerodrome hosts first Virtuals launch with XMAQUINA on May 26 
appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The event could redefine investment in robotics by merging blockchain liquidity with real-world robotics, potentially transforming capital markets. The post Aerodrome hosts first Virtuals launch with XMAQUINA on May 26 appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Aerodrome hosts first Virtuals launch with XMAQUINA on May 26

The Wadoozie Ethereum signal network activates today with a fair launch via 
Uniswap and a 48-state US road tour. Wadoozie confirmed a May 27 fair launch 
for its $WADZ ERC-20 token on the Ethereum network, going live on Uniswap 
today…

The Wadoozie Ethereum signal network activates today with a fair launch via Uniswap and a 48-state US road tour. Wadoozie confirmed a May 27 fair launch for its $WADZ ERC-20 token on the Ethereum network, going live on Uniswap today…

Wadoozie Ethereum signal network launches today in Austin

Ethereum&#8217;s dominance in tokenized stocks highlights its pivotal role in 
institutional blockchain adoption, potentially reshaping financial markets.
The post Ethereum captures 41% market share in $1.6B tokenized stocks market 
appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Ethereum&#8217;s dominance in tokenized stocks highlights its pivotal role in institutional blockchain adoption, potentially reshaping financial markets. The post Ethereum captures 41% market share in $1.6B tokenized stocks market appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Ethereum captures 41% market share in $1.6B tokenized stocks market

Jeff Park argued that crypto is entering a phase similar to Nvidia’s pre- 
mainstream AI era, when the technological shift was visible to early believers 
but not yet obvious to the broader market. In an X post defending crypto’s 
ideological roots on Sunday, Park framed today’s industry as being in a 
difficult “middle game” before onchain capital markets become self-evident 
infrastructure. Park’s comparison centered on Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Elon 
Musk’s first public appearance together at GTC 2015, a moment he described as 
occurring inside a narrow window before AI had become a mainstream consumer or 
institutional priority. By then, Huang had spent decades backing parallel 
graphics processing and had supported CUDA since 2006, while Musk had already 
had what Park called his “Hassabis moment” in 2012. OpenAI, he noted, had not 
yet been founded. “This is that narrow window where a revolution is visible to 
some but not others,” Park wrote, “in which both of these geniuses had early 
inklings of recognizing AI’s pervasive potential, but the broad public was not 
yet made aware. It would take another 10 years for it reach mainstream 
applications of course.” Why Crypto Looks Like Nvidia Park said he sees crypto 
in a similar position today. Before GPUs became central to the AI boom, the 
technology was sustained by gamers, hobbyists and researchers who pushed its 
capabilities without necessarily knowing they were helping subsidize a much 
larger computing transition. In his analogy, early DeFi played a comparable 
role for crypto by subsidizing the development path toward institutional 
tokenization. Related Reading: European Commission Launches Crypto Rules 
Review As Euro Stablecoin Project Gains Support “Gamers subsidized AI’s 
development, just like early DeFi subsidized the institutional tokenization 
development,” he wrote. The core of Park’s argument is that crypto’s hardest 
phase is not the early ideological phase or the eventual mature phase. It is 
the transitional stage between them. He borrowed from Elon Musk’s remarks 
about autonomous driving at GTC 2015, where Musk said the simplest parts were 
very low-speed driving, where a vehicle can stop, and high-speed driving, 
where rules are more structured. The hardest part, in Park’s telling, is the 
10-to-50 mph zone: urban environments with bikes, children, cones, manholes 
and edge cases requiring both precision and speed. Park applied that framework 
to crypto infrastructure. The “0-10 mph” phase was permissionless money, a use 
case he said people could understand from a practical standpoint. The “50 
mph+” phase, in his view, will be onchain capital markets becoming obvious 
because of self-custody, capital efficiency, money velocity and settlement 
optimization. The difficult part is what sits in between. “But its the 10-50 
thats hard, where money in a pre-internet financial infrastructure is hitting 
AML/KYC, offshore capital conduits, discretionary bank risk models, lagging 
reporting regimes create all kinds of need of need for precision and speed 
that institutional infrastructure today needs to develop further,” Park wrote. 
“Its fundamentally solvable, but this is the most challenging portion of 
fulfilling the dreams of onchain capital markets.” Related Reading: Washington 
Moves To Review Crypto Tax Rules With New IRS Study Bill Park also drew a 
distinction between Bitcoin and the wider crypto sector, while rejecting the 
idea that support for one must exclude the other. He said Bitcoin and crypto 
are not trying to solve identical problems, even if both originate from a 
similar ideological impulse around open access. “I love bitcoin. But contrary 
to some opinion, I believe its possible to love crypto too, because bitcoin is 
a monetary experiment enabled by the evolution of technology, while most of 
crypto is the inverse: a technology experiment enabled by the evolution of 
money,” he wrote. “They are fundamentally solving different problems, though 
rooted in one ideal: to make its access as much of a public good as possible.” 
Park’s broader thesis is that the ideology behind crypto is not fading but 
changing shape. He described the “winning ideology” as “technological 
financialization,” a form of hyperfinancialization with decentralizing 
elements that exports sovereign finance, agentic rails and self-determination 
as public goods. That framing matters because much of the industry’s current 
debate is focused on whether crypto’s institutionalization weakens its 
original purpose. Park’s answer is that the ideological layer remains 
essential, but the practical expression of that ideology is now moving through 
financial infrastructure, tokenized markets and systems that need to interact 
with existing compliance and banking regimes. “This ‘middle game’ period will 
be remembered as the most critical juncture for the industry,” Park wrote, 
adding that the future belongs to “those who recognized it was always 
ideological.” At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $2.55 
trillion. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Jeff Park argued that crypto is entering a phase similar to Nvidia’s pre- mainstream AI era, when the technological shift was visible to early believers but not yet obvious to the broader market. In an X post defending crypto’s ideological roots on Sunday, Park framed today’s industry as being in a difficult “middle game” before &#8230;

Crypto Today Looks Like Nvidia Before AI Went Mainstream, Jeff Park Says

Stanford cryptographer Dan Boneh says Bitcoin should prepare for quantum risk 
now, but warns a rushed post quantum migration could cause worse failures than 
the threat itself. Bitcoin’s post quantum transition debate is escalating 
after Isabel Foxen Duke highlighted a…

Stanford cryptographer Dan Boneh says Bitcoin should prepare for quantum risk now, but warns a rushed post quantum migration could cause worse failures than the threat itself. Bitcoin’s post quantum transition debate is escalating after Isabel Foxen Duke highlighted a…

Aave DAO Faces Vote on Native BTC Collateral as Babylon Labs Files Temp Check

Comments