Polymarket put the odds of President Donald Trump being impeached before his 
term ends at 64% on Apr. 7, near the contract&#8217;s high-water mark since its Mar. 
19 launch. A comparable Kalshi contract, which resolves against Library of 
Congress records and runs through Jan. 1, 2028, was priced around 67% in the 
same window. Driving […]
The post Bitcoin rebounds as oil cools but Trump impeachment odds show markets 
still on edge appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin rebounds as oil cools but Trump impeachment odds show markets still on edge

xPrime, Stretch and xStream, winners of the inaugural xStocks Hackathon, show 
how tokenized equities can evolve into prime brokerage, structured products 
and automated strategy layers built natively on-chain. The inaugural xStocks 
Hackathon on the French Riviera compressed the future of…

xStocks hackathon shows how on-chain equities grow beyond price trackers

Circle Internet Group launched CPN Managed Payments on Wednesday, a full-stack 
stablecoin settlement platform designed to let banks, fintechs, and payment 
service providers process USDC transactions without holding or managing 
digital assets. Key Takeaways: Circle launched CPN Managed Payments on April 
8, 2026, giving PSPs and banks access to USDC settlement without holding 
digital assets. […]

Circle Launches CPN Managed Payments for Banks and PSPs to Settle in USDC Without Holding Crypto

Aave is under selling pressure. The market is pricing risk. And according to 
top analyst Darkfost, what is happening to AAVE right now is not a market 
problem — it is a protocol problem. Related Reading: A Key Bitcoin Signal Is 
Quietly Building While The Price Stays Flat: Here Is What to Watch Next A 
report from Darkfost has identified a sequence of structural events that 
explains why Aave&#8217;s selling pressure carries more weight than a standard 
altcoin correction. The protocol has entered what the analyst describes as a 
negative spiral — a self-reinforcing deterioration that pushed AAVE below the 
$100 psychological threshold in March and has not yet found a floor that the 
market trusts. The events behind that spiral are specific and named. BGD Labs, 
one of Aave&#8217;s key technical contributor teams, departed the protocol. More 
recently, Chaos Labs — the risk management firm whose work directly informed 
Aave&#8217;s protocol parameters and security framework — followed. These are not 
peripheral contributors. They are the people whose expertise underpinned the 
protocol&#8217;s credibility with institutional users and DeFi participants who 
evaluated Aave on the quality of its risk infrastructure. Internal 
disagreements have accompanied each departure. The cumulative effect on 
sentiment has been direct: investors who were holding AAVE through the broader 
altcoin weakness are now choosing between capitulating at a loss or securing 
whatever profit margin remains. The selling is not irrational. It is informed. 
The On-Chain Data Has Confirmed What the Price Already Suspected Darkfost&#8217;s 
exchange reserve analysis gives the structural deterioration its most 
measurable form. Since early February, Aave reserves across exchanges have 
risen from 2.07 million to 2.23 million AAVE — a directional shift that has 
been building consistently rather than arriving as a single spike. Of that 
total, 1.63 million AAVE now sits on Binance alone, up from 1.57 million over 
the same period. The coins are moving toward selling venues, and they have 
been doing so for months. What makes the current reading historically 
significant is not the absolute level but where it sits relative to the 
longer-term trend. Aave exchange reserves have now crossed back above their 
90-day moving average — ending a declining reserve trend that had been in 
place since April 2025. For nearly a year, reserves were falling, which 
reflected holders keeping AAVE off exchanges and away from the immediate sell 
side. That trend has reversed. The direction that provided a structural floor 
for the asset has flipped. The timing compounds the concern. This reversal is 
not occurring in a neutral market environment — it is occurring in one that 
Darkfost explicitly identifies as unfavorable for holding altcoins. The 
structural pressure and the macro pressure are pointing in the same direction 
simultaneously. When exchange reserves rise, selling intent rises with them. 
The 90-day MA breach confirms this is not a temporary fluctuation. It is a 
regime change. Related Reading: XRP Spot Buying Hits $520M While Futures Stay 
Negative. Here Is the Signal To Watch For A Real Move Aave Breaks Below $100 
as Long-Term Structure Deteriorates Aave has decisively lost the $100 
psychological level, confirming a structural breakdown that extends beyond a 
typical altcoin correction. The weekly chart shows a clear rejection from the 
$300–$350 region in 2025, followed by a sustained sequence of lower highs and 
accelerating downside momentum. Price is now trading below all major moving 
averages, with the 50-week (blue), 100-week (green), and 200-week (red) 
trending downward or flattening—an alignment that reflects persistent macro 
weakness. The most recent leg lower stands out for its velocity. A sharp 
selloff pushed AAVE from the $180 region to below $100 with minimal 
consolidation, indicating forced selling rather than orderly distribution. 
Volume expanded during this move, reinforcing the view that supply overwhelmed 
demand at key levels. Related Reading: $82 Million In Ethereum Just Left 
FalconX: Discover Who Is Behind It Attempts to stabilize near current prices 
have so far lacked conviction. The market is compressing just below former 
support, now acting as resistance, with no clear signs of accumulation. 
Structurally, this places Aave in a vulnerable position: a failure to reclaim 
the $110–$120 zone leaves the door open for a continuation toward prior cycle 
lows. Until price reclaims key moving averages and rebuilds a higher high 
structure, AAVE remains in a confirmed downtrend driven by sustained sell-side 
pressure. Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com

Aave Breakdown Deepens With Supply Flooding Back To Binance. Learn What Triggered The Rush

Blockstream CEO, Adam Back, denied on Wednesday that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, 
the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin (BTC), responding to a New York Times 
(NYT) investigation that pointed to him as the leading suspect. The NYT 
report, by John Carreyrou, drew on a range of circumstantial evidence — 
including parallels in writing style, the use of British spellings, and 
overlapping cryptographic expertise — to argue that Back could be the person 
behind Bitcoin’s origin story. Adam Back Rejects NYT Case In his post on 
social media platform X (previously Twitter), Back said plainly, “I’m not 
Satoshi,” and emphasized that his long-standing interest in cryptography and 
electronic cash predates Bitcoin by decades. Back pushed back on the 
interpretation of evidence presented in the NYT story, suggesting that his 
frequent postings on ecash topics create a statistical bias. Related Reading: 
Ethereum (ETH) Outlook: $2,500 Break Could Trigger Major Rally — Expert’s 
Price Scenarios He argued that because he was outspoken and prolific on 
relevant mailing lists, his comments appear often in historical archives; that 
visibility, he told Carreyrou, can create “confirmation bias” when researchers 
search for likely Satoshi candidates. “Because I was talkative on the list, 
and known to have an active interest in ecash, there&#8217;s some confirmation bias 
in finding my comments frequently on ecash topics,” Back wrote, noting that 
other participants with similar expertise posted far less and so are less 
likely to surface in retrospective searches. Satoshi’s Mystery Is Healthy For 
Bitcoin Back also characterized much of the apparent overlap between his and 
Satoshi’s language as a coincidence or the product of a shared technical 
lexicon among cryptographers who had been wrestling with similar problems for 
years. Related Reading: FDIC Advances Rulemaking For GENIUS Act: New Framework 
For Stablecoin Issuers Throughout his response, Back also maintained that he 
does not know Satoshi’s identity and suggested that this uncertainty is 
beneficial for Bitcoin. “I also don&#8217;t know who Satoshi is, and I think it is 
good for Bitcoin that this is the case, as it helps Bitcoin be viewed as new 
asset class, the mathematically scarce digital commodity,” he wrote, framing 
the mystery as part of Bitcoin’s appeal and institutional development. 
Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Cryptocurrency price in THB