A proposed plan by the agency would ban “pass-through insurance“ for 
stablecoins by third parties in addition to the FDIC not insuring deposits 
under the law.

FDIC chair says no deposit insurance for stablecoins under GENIUS Act

Bitcoin hovered in a narrow band between $69,000 and $71,000 as traders 
weighed mixed diplomatic signals over a possible Middle East ceasefire. 
Divergent Signals From Washington Bitcoin maintained a tight consolidation 
pattern between $69,000 and $71,000 Wednesday as market participants grappled 
with conflicting diplomatic signals regarding a potential ceasefire in the 
Middle East. The top […]

Bitcoin Holds $69K–$71K Range Amid Middle East Ceasefire Confusion

The digital asset infrastructure company plans to launch the pool in April as 
it expands beyond Bitcoin mining services.

Foundry plans Zcash mining pool amid institutional interest in privacy coin

The latest liquidity picture suggests digital dollars are still building 
inside crypto, but they are concentrating on the chains with the deepest 
trust, clearest utility, and strongest settlement gravity. For much of the 
last cycle, stablecoin growth was treated as a simple bullish cue. More 
digital dollars meant more buying power, more risk appetite, and, eventually, 
more upside for Bitcoin and the broader market. That reading still matters, 
but it is no longer enough. In 2026, the real signal is not just whether 
stablecoin liquidity is growing. It is where that liquidity is choosing to sit 
before it gets deployed. The current USD stablecoin category is roughly a $306 
billion market, large enough that internal capital rotation now says as much 
about market structure as headline expansion does. The Real Signal Is Not 
Supply Alone A recent BitBullNews Stablecoin Flow Monitor made that 
distinction especially clear. Its core finding was not that capital left 
crypto. It did not. The more useful takeaway was that liquidity kept expanding 
overall while becoming more selective in distribution. Ethereum posted the 
largest absolute weekly gain in tracked stablecoin supply, Tron continued 
reinforcing its role as the market’s dominant USDT corridor, Base stood out as 
one of the strongest relative gainers, Solana held broadly steady, and 
Arbitrum recorded the clearest decline among the major chains covered in the 
report. That is not a market-wide retreat. It is a market choosing where it 
feels safest warehousing dollars. That distinction matters because stablecoins 
are not passive background assets anymore. They are the market’s dry powder, 
settlement layer, and increasingly its confidence gauge. When fresh supply 
builds broadly, that can be read as available fuel. But when it clusters 
unevenly, the more revealing question becomes what kind of risk the market is 
willing to take next. Concentrated flows usually say more than aggregate 
numbers do. Ethereum, Tron, And Base Are Telling Different Stories Ethereum’s 
latest growth reinforces its role as the balance-sheet layer of crypto. It 
remains the network most closely associated with deep collateral markets, 
large DeFi positions, institutional familiarity, and high-value settlement. 
When fresh stablecoin balances keep moving there, the message is usually less 
speculative than structural. Capital is not necessarily chasing the hottest 
beta first. It is often parking where liquidity depth and composability are 
strongest. Tron, by contrast, is winning a very different contest. It is not 
the chain institutions cite most often in polished tokenization presentations, 
but it remains one of the most important rails for moving digital dollars at 
scale. The BitBullNews monitor notes that Tron stayed firmly in second place 
in tracked stablecoin supply and continued to function as the market’s 
dominant USDT transport corridor. That matters because efficiency, 
distribution, and transactional utility still beat narrative elegance when 
real capital needs to move. Base is perhaps the most interesting middle case. 
Its growth looks less like an ideological shift and more like targeted 
migration into a cheaper, faster extension of the Ethereum orbit. In the March 
2–8 snapshot, Base added more than $140 million in tracked stablecoin supply 
and remained overwhelmingly USDC-led. That suggests it is increasingly being 
used as a practical expansion zone for dollar liquidity that wants Ethereum 
adjacency without full Ethereum cost. Why This Matters For Bitcoin Before It 
Matters For Altcoins This is where many market participants still overread 
stablecoin growth. More on-chain dollars do not automatically mean altseason 
is around the corner. Sometimes they mean caution with optionality. Sometimes 
they mean liquidity is preparing for deployment but has not yet chosen risk. 
Sometimes they mean the market prefers rails over exposure. For Bitcoin, that 
distinction is important. BTC is usually the first major beneficiary when on- 
chain dollar capacity remains healthy because it is still the cleanest, 
deepest, most institutionally legible expression of crypto risk. If stablecoin 
liquidity is building while concentrating in the most trusted environments, 
that can support Bitcoin before it supports lower-quality or narrative-driven 
parts of the market. In that sense, chain-level stablecoin flow can act as a 
lead indicator for how selectively the next wave of capital may move. This is 
an inference, but it is the one the latest market structure most strongly 
supports. Issuer Quality Still Sets The Ceiling There is also a second layer 
to this story: not all digital dollars carry the same trust profile. Circle 
says USDC is always redeemable 1:1 for dollars, backed by highly liquid cash 
and cash-equivalent assets, with reserve composition disclosed publicly. On 
March 6, 2026, Circle showed USDC reserves composition on its transparency 
page and described the majority of reserves as being held in the Circle 
Reserve Fund, an SEC-registered government money market fund. That does not 
reduce the centrality of Tether, which remains the largest stablecoin and one 
of the deepest pools of crypto-native dollar liquidity. But it does explain 
why the market often uses USDT and USDC differently. In a stablecoin system 
still overwhelmingly dominated by those two issuers, disclosure quality, 
redemption confidence, and distribution power are not side issues. They are 
market-structure variables. Final Take The key question now is no longer 
whether stablecoins are growing. They are. The more important question is 
where that growth is settling, and what kind of behavior that usually 
precedes. Right now, the answer looks selective rather than euphoric. Digital 
dollars are staying inside crypto, but they are becoming more deliberate about 
which chains deserve them first. That is a constructive signal for the market, 
but not an indiscriminate one. And for Bitcoin, that may be exactly the kind 
of setup that matters most: liquidity is present, trust is concentrated, and 
capital still appears to prefer quality before it prefers chaos.

Stablecoins Aren’t Leaving Crypto — They’re Choosing Their Winners

Strive has raised the dividend on its SATA preferred stock to 12.75% while 
tying more of its balance sheet to Bitcoin and high‑yield preferred equity 
bets. Strive (NASDAQ: ASST) has raised the dividend yield on its SATA 
preferred stock to…

Cryptocurrency price in BTC