What to Know: A Hassett-led Fed under a Trump administration could mean 
earlier rate cuts and a more tolerant crypto stance, boosting risk-asset 
demand globally. Wallets sit at the front line of any new adoption wave, but 
many incumbents remain either highly centralized or overly complex for retail 
users. Best Wallet targets these gaps with MPC-secured, mobile-first UX plus 
tokenized perks, aiming for 40% global crypto wallet market share by end-2026. 
If US policy genuinely softens, infrastructure tokens tied to wallets, on- 
ramps and aggregators may see renewed interest alongside large-cap Layer-1 
assets. Kevin Hassett stepping into pole position as President Donald Trump’s 
preferred candidate for the next Fed Chair is more than a personnel story; 
it’s a regime shift signal. That’s because Kevin Hassett isn’t a neutral 
party. He’s strongly pro-crypto, a stakeholder in Coinbase, and has gone on 
record as wanting to cut rates now. Analysts are excited, and markets are 
already gaming out a tilt toward earlier rate cuts, looser dollar liquidity, 
and a friendlier stance toward digital assets and financial innovation. For 
crypto, that combination typically acts as rocket fuel. Lower real yields 
reduce the opportunity cost of holding volatile assets like Bitcoin and Ether, 
while a less hostile regulatory tone lowers headline risk for exchanges, 
stablecoins and token issuers. If you’re already positioned in crypto, you’re 
effectively front‑running a potential pivot in US monetary and regulatory 
policy. But cheaper liquidity alone doesn’t onboard the next 100M users. What 
actually determines whether new capital sticks is infrastructure: wallets, 
ramps and applications that feel safe, intuitive and rewarding for everyday 
users, not just DeFi natives. That’s where the next competitive cycle is 
likely to play out if a Hassett-led Fed normalizes the macro backdrop. In that 
context, Best Wallet Token ($BEST) is positioned as a bet on the wallet layer 
rather than just another speculative token. The Best Wallet app aims to pair 
institutional‑grade security with mobile‑first UX and presale access, pitching 
itself as a gateway product for the next wave of mainstream adoption if 
regulatory clouds clear. As the macro narrative evolves, you’re likely to see 
more attention on which wallet ecosystems can actually capture and retain this 
inflow. That shift from trading coins to owning rails puts projects like Best 
Wallet in a very different category than short‑cycle meme coins or one‑off 
DeFi farms. How A Hassett Fed Could Reshape Crypto Wallet Demand If Hassett 
does take the chair, markets would likely price in a faster path to policy 
easing and a softer line on digital assets. That combination historically 
correlates with higher trading volumes, exchange sign‑ups, and first‑time 
wallet downloads as retail traders re‑enter the market looking for beta. Most 
of those newcomers won’t start on hardcore DeFi. They’ll land in 
retail‑friendly wallets like MetaMask, Trust Wallet or Coinbase Wallet, which 
act as default gateways. Yet these incumbents either lean heavily centralized, 
with KYC and recovery tied to a single provider, or remain clunky for 
mobile‑first users who expect a Web2‑grade experience. This is the opening 
innovative wallet ecosystems like Best Wallet are chasing. The Best Wallet 
Token presale enters this crowded field trying to solve for security, UX and 
upside participation in one stack, rather than forcing you to choose. Why Best 
Wallet Token Is Leaning into the Next Cycle Where many wallets simply custody 
assets and route swaps, Best Wallet Token is trying to build an integrated 
environment for what a more permissive US policy regime might unleash. The 
project’s core claim is ambitious: capture up to 40% of global crypto wallet 
market share by the end of 2026 by offering the easiest, safest and most 
feature‑rich mobile experience. On the security side, Best Wallet plans to be 
the first fully integrated Fireblocks MPC‑CMP wallet in the retail segment, 
bringing institutional‑grade multi‑party computation to everyday users. In 
practice, that means key material is split across multiple parties and 
devices, removing the single private‑key failure point that has plagued 
traditional non‑custodial wallets for a decade. Beyond security, the wallet 
leans into discovery and execution. A built‑in Upcoming Tokens portal is 
designed to simplify presale participation by curating and vetting early‑stage 
opportunities, while a Best DEX aggregator – powered by Rubic – routes trades 
across 200+ DEXs and 20 cross‑chain bridges. That’s aimed squarely at the 
cross‑chain fragmentation you probably feel every time you move between 
ecosystems. The $BEST token underpins this ecosystem with real utility: 
reduced fees inside the Best Wallet stack, boosted yields via a staking 
aggregator, governance rights, and preferential access to curated presales. 
The presale has already raised $17.5M, with tokens currently priced at 
$0.026005 and staking at 75%, suggesting growing demand for exposure to the 
wallet layer of the stack. To join in, discover how to buy $BEST. On‑chain 
data shows significant whale transactions (as verified on-chain), including 
one of $70.2K. This hints at the fact that some smart money is positioning 
early around the thesis that wallets, not just Layer-1s and Layer-2s, could be 
prime beneficiaries of a friendlier US policy environment. If you share that 
view, this cycle may be less about chasing every new token and more about 
choosing the right rails. That cycle could benefit $BEST incredibly – our 
$BEST price prediction sees the token potentially reaching $0.05106175 by the 
end of 2026. Research, then decide whether $BEST fits your risk profile. But 
hurry – the Best Wallet Token presale closes in less than two days. 🚀 Join the 
$BEST presale while you still can. Disclaimer: This article is for 
informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment or 
trading advice; always do your own research. Authored by Aaron Walker for 
NewsBTC – https://www.newsbtc.com/news/kevin-hasset-takes-pole-position-for- 
future-fed-chair-best-wallet-to-benefit

Kevin Hasset Takes Pole Position for Future Fed Chair, Best Wallet to Benefit?

Reverting to the MATIC ticker could strengthen brand identity and community 
engagement, potentially impacting Polygon&#8217;s market positioning.
The post Polygon co-founder considers reverting POL token to its original 
MATIC ticker appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Polygon co-founder considers reverting POL token to its original MATIC ticker

Polygon’s co-founder says even small merchants and drivers recognized MATIC, 
but many now struggle to locate POL after the token’s rebrand.

Polygon co-founder mulls resurrecting MATIC a year after POL rebrand

Bitcoin may be clinging to the $86K level like it’s got something to prove, 
but make no mistake — this market’s got more layers than a blockchain 
protocol. Despite a flicker of life in the 4-hour chart, the broader 
technicals are flashing warning signs like a miner’s rig overheating in July. 
Bitcoin Chart Outlook Let’s […]

Bitcoin Price Watch: $86K Support Holds — But for How Long?

Bitcoin’s famous four-year halving rhythm is giving way to a shorter, ETF- 
driven performance clock, argues ProCap Chief Investment Officer (CIO) Jeff 
Park in a new Substack essay. In his view, the dominant force in Bitcoin’s 
boom-bust dynamics is shifting “from mining economics to fund-manager 
economics,” with a new “two-year cycle” anchored in ETF flows and 
institutional return hurdles. Park starts by declaring that the traditional 
pattern built around halvings belongs to “the old Bitcoin.” Historically, 
programmed supply cuts compressed miner margins, pushed weaker operators out 
and reduced structural sell pressure. Combined with a powerful narrative, each 
halving triggered a reflexive loop of “early positioning, rising prices, media 
virality, retail FOMO and leveraged mania” that ended in a bust. That 
mechanism, he argues, is now significantly diluted. With most of Bitcoin’s 
eventual supply already circulating, each halving shaves off a smaller 
fraction of the total float. The “diminishing marginal inflation impact” means 
the issuance shock is too small to reliably drive the next cycle on its own. 
The ETF-Driven 2-Year Bitcoin Cycle Begins Instead, Park contends that Bitcoin 
is increasingly governed by how professional allocators behave inside ETF 
wrappers. He openly labels his framework as resting on “three heavy-handed, 
contestable assumptions.” Related Reading: Capriole Founder Not Bearish On 
Bitcoin Despite Headwinds—Here’s Why First, most institutional investors are 
de facto evaluated over one- to two-year horizons because of how liquid fund 
investment committees operate. Second, new net liquidity into Bitcoin will be 
dominated by ETF channels, making them the main footprint to watch. Third, the 
selling behavior of legacy “OG whales” remains the largest supply variable, 
but is treated as exogenous to his ETF-centric analysis. Within this lens, two 
concepts matter most: common-holder risk and calendar-year P&amp;L. Park notes 
that when “everyone owns the same thing,” flows can amplify both rallies and 
drawdowns. But he focuses on something easier to observe: the way annual 
performance crystallizes on December 31. For hedge funds in particular, “when 
volatility increases towards the end of the year” and there isn’t enough P&amp;L 
“baked in,” managers become more willing to sell their riskiest positions. The 
choice, he writes, is often “the difference between getting another shot to 
play in 2026, or getting fired.” Park leans on Ahoniemi and Jylhä’s 2011 paper 
Flows, Price Pressure, and Hedge Fund Returns, highlighting its finding that a 
large share of hedge-fund “alpha” is flow-driven and that return–reversal 
cycles stretch “almost two years.” This, he says, offers a blueprint for how 
liquidity and performance feedbacks could structure Bitcoin’s ETF era. He then 
sketches how a CIO might sell Bitcoin internally: as an asset expected to 
deliver something like a 25–30 percent compound annual return. On that basis, 
a position must generate roughly 50 percent over two years to justify its risk 
and fee drag. Park references Michael Saylor’s “30% CAGR for the next 20 
years” as a rough institutional hurdle. From there he builds a three-cohort 
thought experiment. Investors who bought via ETFs from inception through year- 
end 2024 are up around 100 percent in a single year, effectively having 
“pulled forward 2.6 years of performance.” A second cohort that entered on 1 
January 2025 is roughly 7 percent underwater, now needing “80%+ over the next 
year, or 50% over the next two years” to hit the same hurdle. A third group, 
holding from inception through the end of 2025, is up about 85 percent over 
two years—only slightly ahead of its 30 percent CAGR target. For that group, 
Park says, the live question becomes: “Do I sell and lock it now, or do I let 
it run longer?” Related Reading: Bitcoin Flashes A Triple Bearish Divergence: 
CMT Sounds The Alarm ETF flow data sharpen the picture. Park highlights that 
Bitcoin now trades near “an increasingly important price, $84k,” which he 
characterizes as roughly the aggregate cost basis of ETF flows to date. While 
2024 inflows carry substantial embedded gains, “almost none of the ETF flows 
in 2025 are in the green,” with March as a partial exception. October 2024, 
the largest inflow month, saw Bitcoin around $70,000; November 2024 closed 
near $96,000. On a 30 percent hurdle, Park estimates one-year targets of 
roughly $91,000 and $125,000 dollars for those vintages. June 2025 inflows 
near $107,000 imply a $140,000 target by June 2026. He argues that Bitcoin ETF 
AUM is now at an “inflection point,” where a 10 percent price drop would drag 
total AUM back to roughly its level at the start of the year. That would leave 
the ETF complex with little to show, in dollar P&amp;L, for 2025 despite taking on 
meaningful risk and inflows. The key takeaway, Park writes, is that investors 
must track not only the average ETF cost basis, but also “the moving average 
of that P&amp;L by vintage.” Those rolling profit profiles will, in his view, 
become the main “liquidity pressures and circuit breakers” for Bitcoin, 
eclipsing the old four-year halving template. His second conclusion cuts 
against retail intuition: “If Bitcoin price doesn’t move, but time moves 
forward, this is ultimately bad for Bitcoin in the institutional era.” In a 
fee-and-benchmark world, flat is not neutral; it is underperformance versus 
the 30 percent ROI that justified the allocation. That alone can trigger 
selling. “In summary,” Park concludes, “the 4-year cycle is definitely over.” 
Bitcoin will still be driven by marginal demand, marginal supply and profit- 
taking. But “the buyers have changed,” and with halving-driven supply shocks 
less decisive, it is the more “predictable” incentives of ETF 
managers—expressed over roughly two-year windows—that may now define Bitcoin’s 
market cycle. At press time, Bitcoin traded at $87,559. Featured image created 
with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Cryptocurrency price in ARS